Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 7bit's commentslogin

Hey man it's ok. The motivation to learn stuff should be intrinsic, not extrinsic. There no value learning something that you're not interested in, because it can only be applied to topics that you won't also be interested in. Don't stress it. If you're happy with what AI gives you, it's good enough

You have something to contribute besides polemic statements?

I don't think I ever charged my phone while listening to music on my wireless in-ears. So that's a non-issue for me

Bad mods will ignore the rules, regardless how transparent they are.

We're talking about a multi-layer problem where every solution open another multi-layered problem.


It's really hard, but I found a good way to focus on friends and non-tech activities. Social networks like Reddit or services like YouTube become less important and it doesn't aggravate as much when it becomes less of a focus.

> “This partnership with Astound and Stonepeak is the next step in our decade-long mission to redefine what customers can expect from their internet provider,” GFiber CEO Dinni Jain said in a statement.

He really must think we are dumb. You sold the majority of the company, because you don't want it to be your mission any longer. Otherwise you would not have sold the majority of stakes. What a loser.


> "not know" was oversimplified from me

Your entire post comes town to "oversimplified", to frame it generous. To frame it factual: misinformation.

> technically such things exist in many countries, most likely also Italy.

Yeah? Which ones? Quote the sections and then we'll continue ...


Criminal Tax Code (D.Lgs. 74/2000)

but also overlaps with other laws, e.g. wrt. failing to act in due diligence

(other laws) like you are legally required to act with due-diligence, as CFO this inherently means knowing about the finances of the company so even if you claim you didn't know it's not exactly changing anything as not keeping up with your due diligence still makes you as likely


> If you are found personally responsible for tax evasion >1e6€ then the minimal penalty is prison sentence without parole option. This is true for many EU countries including Italy. Idk. about the max. prison length in Italy for this but e.g. where I live in the EU you are likely looking at ~15 years for 1e9€ tax evasion.

There's o EU wide tax law, so that statement is misleading at best and there's many places where that's false. You're spreading misinformation.

> The reason executives commonly avoid such penalties is because they avoid being found personally liable by claiming they didn't known, did misunderstood the situation, where deceived by others etc.

Misinformation again. This blanket statement in just false. Again, because there is no EU-wide law. It's up to the countries and they handle it very differently.


Because the EM Dash is not universally used. In Germany we use the EN Dash. That's also why the proposal is dumb. It has the typical US-centric view you would expect from a typical American.

You're completely wrong.

"better" is an objective evaluation that you can do in a test, not in an interview with an AI.

And AIs always have human bias encoded, because it's trained on human data. That's a well known problem with no absolute solution.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: