Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AIorNot's commentslogin

guys former NASA Mission Control Web Tool Team and OCA here (Orbital Comms Adapter office which was a backroom position)

Crews have been using thinkpad laptops (personal laptops since the 2005) on the ISS and Shuttle. Artemis is likely an extension of this

Laptops go through a long space hardening and verification process. Windows and Outlook is the result of that

We used to do "Mail Syncs" which taking the outlook file and pushing it up to the crews laptop doing a comm window via TDRSS network -that how astronauts got their email

is this high tech - no -does it work and been done for years yes.


> guys former NASA Mission Control Web Tool Team and OCA here

Wow, very cool and lot's of respect!

But... why not use linux, unix, custom OS, iPad, Android, Nintendo SNES, Atari, Commodore 64... anything BUT Microsoft?

(Seriously though, why not Linux? I'd really appreciate if you could answer, thank you! )


Well as to why they were chosen back in the STS (shuttle) era (before my time) see a good history on the decision here: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=27043.0

1. In the space program decisions are made years before and changes are very difficult owing to a myriad of reasons from procedures to paperwork, eg there was a whole mirror lab setup on the ground To support them etc

2. Astronauts/Aerospace operationally often come from defense world - they are used to windows - see DoD -that battle was fought in the 80s/90s

3. Once something is a part of the space program it takes on a life of its own/ we had an IIS webserver onboard the ISS for example and also apache tomcat - we (myself wrote software for both) using .NET and Java

4. Training and operational software and docs were all MS Office variety for years (were talking from floppy disk era here)

5. Lot of other linux/unix based systems too this is is just crew support laptops - not considered mission critical


instead of calling this corporate malfeasance lets call it what it for what it really is:

its Bunch of inexperienced people (kids really) stealing stuff from each other. (Not a proper 'Compliance' company) -The CEO is like 22 years old!!! WTF guys you think this guy knows compliance??? lol

Ie in a fast high pressure environment called Y Combinator where the 'adults' are pressuring and hyping each other's products and stealing open source, AI generating and in general trying to productize every crappy idea they can think of to capture some VC or investor who is too dumb to do proper due diligence in the AI gold-rush and hype train

On top of that engineering is so high pressured and awful these days e.g this video from the kids in silicon valley: https://youtu.be/0tLEszJs7hc?si=OXrJqPg-5PhVGnYT



Damm Anthropic had a chance to say april fools too for the claude code leak!!

OMG WTF

As a former NASA guy I would trust Eric Bergers measured and detailed reporting here over that blog post that says they are all going to die

As he shows that Olivas changed his mind:

“ Olivas told me he had changed his mind, expressing appreciation and admiration for the in-depth engineering work done by the NASA team. He would now fly on Orion”

Anyway we live in an age of armchair experts in youtube (who are often very smart but quick to rush to judgment without enough context)

The article explains the situation in a more balanced and fair light


How about former NASA engineer Charles Camarda? Linked from the article: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ddi792xdfNXcBwF8qpDUxmZz...

I agree, this report from astronaut Camarda should really alarm NASA.

Not really - read the Berger article for more details above -Camarda is older, in his 70s and his attitude overall (based on the reports) reads more like an ego bruise than serious reflection on the engineering problem

Obviously concerns should be vetted by the engineering teams involved but it appears they have been addressed to meet the needs of the mission


All this to say: OpenClaw is hella insecure and unreliable?

I mean all of in the space already know this but I suppose its important to be showcasing the problems of systems of agents


We're Missing the biggest frauds of all time: https://www.whitehouse.gov/

When your president is a complete fraud and con man, the whole country is tarnished - its too late for America to bounce back, we are in end stage capitalism now that Trump and his cronies are siphoning money out of the boundaries his administration establish -no different than Putin and his oligrachs except that America still has some protections in place..


well why was Cursor included amongst known fraudsters.. that just seems mean and warrentless

In the section that says:

100% SATIRICAL — SCORES ARE FICTIONAL AND DO NOT REFLECT REAL-WORLD FRAUD RISK

?

Personally I think it’s not a bad thing to be a little skeptical about brand new companies with double digit billion dollar valuations. If they’re legit they can more than withstand a little satirical dig.


I'm all for the big names and ones that have proven issues and companies like Delve to be shamed

But Cursor? Why they are operating in a risky space on tech that is all new what ethical things did they do to warrent inclusion in this shame board?

Lets not tarnish folks either -cancel culture is worrisome there


Trump and his Tech Bros enable this to make money for themselves its like Trump is turning the whole of America into Alternate reality Hill Valley of 1985 in Back to the Future

https://youtu.be/gwJQG4tFqZA?si=9IbdAR4O-lGiTVtN

See: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/21/politics/trump-prediction-mar...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: