I have just launched my Indiegogo campaign for Artificial Intuition, a deck of cards with strategies for modifying your prompts for ML models like ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion.
Sadly that is exactly my case where it stopped responding. I thought it was your design goal! And I don't want to walk through the adventure again, especially after I jumped off the platforms twice.
Well I fixed it for the next person at least. It is still a bit laggier than it should be but it will no longer crash your browser. Thanks for playing!
^ this made some odd looking number folders. No idea which folder was in which folder, but, ok...
for(var i=0;i<2;i++) for(var j=0;j<2;j++) for (var k=0;k<2;k++) for (var l=0;l<2;l++) ls ${i}/${j}/${k}/${l}
This did nothing, so I'm not sure if you fixed it or just placed a cap on how much js you are executing... (should have at least shown 16 frames)
for(var i=0;i<8;i++) for(var j=0;j<8;j++) for (var k=0;k<8;k++) for (var l=0;l<8;l++) open ${i}/${j}/${k}/${l}
Is/was producing a nice log of things not opened...of course my browser tab is busy logging 6 GB+ of history (does your terminal have a scrollback limit?)
Cute game, maybe I'll try to open the box later after I get some sleep. Not sure what I would use the terminal for, though - is basically what you're trying to do an interactive scratchpad with history?
If that's the case, I would look into Jupyter e.g., I'm not sure I get the point otherwise.
I made it so that it short circuits the frame creation of if there aren't going to be any files to show in that directory.
I'm honestly not sure if the web sandbox I made has enough realism to solve that puzzle though programming. There is a feature of snail that I was using to get past it.
This sounds similar to a situation I know of that occurred a few years ago and the person in question got terminated for a particular cause, but they were the kind of person who decides if what they were saying was a joke depending on if you laugh or agree and has been very careful around their manager.
The language you are using makes me think you might be getting pinged from hiring processes because you are very angry/anxious about this whole situation and probably not putting your best foot forward.
That combined with the anxiety of the world being on fire may be making things worse in all sorts of ways, both for you and the teams you are interviewing with.
No damage that is solely reputational is permanent, so it seems you are stuck catastrophising. That can put people in survival mode and I know when I’m at work I want to be in a creative mode environment so you may not be coming across as a cultural fit.
I don’t think you’ve come to terms with the situation and I’d recommend you talk to a therapist before resuming your job search.
I think you may be right, and maybe I am psyching myself out. I've always been a very good interviewer/interviewee (even helping others out with a job search!) This has all been so much, I don't even feel like the same person I was before.
The harvard link touches on how he was using cheap Google Ads for this purpose. It reminds me of a shady "internet background check" company that I had the unfortunate pleasure of working with a few years ago. They were approaching, if not exceeding, this site in total shady tactics. One thing they did that their former-pill-pushing founders came up with which I did think was rather clever is they were able to buy Ad Words for cheap for various permutations of common given names and they used this to bootstrap their business to great effect.
Facebook does not allow you to build a custom audience of 1 person. I believe it has to be a minimum size of 100 or thereabout. Which means when Spinner says your target will get 180 impressions, they have to throw in 99 random non-targets into the targeted audience in order to get the placement. Thus they really aren't marking it up as much as you think.
They would batch them though, wait for 100 clients who want the same and put them in the batch. So it does provide a marginal service, viewed from that angle.
'He loves quiet chats over his own dinner table
with such friends as Gerhart Hauptmann
and Professor Schrodinger. He reads only
little. Modern fiction does not seduce him.
Even in science he limits himself largely to
his special field. "Reading after a certain
age diverts the mind too much from it's creative pursuits. Any man who reads too
much and uses his own brain too little falls
into lazy habits of thinking, just as the
man who spends too much time in the
theater is tempted to be content with living
vicariously instead of living his own life."
In his own field of thought Einstein follows every development with keen interest.
He has the gift of reading at a glance a whole
page of equations. Einstein can master a
whole new system of mathematics in half
an hour.'
