Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | annon3845's commentslogin

Joshua Hall's Sunday post on X alleges Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is leading talks for a complete pardon to bring Snowden home from Russia.


It's not much, but https://www.instagram.com/p/CgAu-TTlBHS. They're not exactly helping their credibility with claims of 16x superZoom from a 720p camera.


It looks like it is actually a 5mp camera. Specifically a Omnivision OV5640. I wonder if it is a 720p camera at 16x zoom.

https://docs.brilliantmonocle.com/monocle/monocle/#camera


It's a 5MP camera for still photos, limited to 720p for video--although the data sheet says it can do 1080p as well. Perhaps that's bottlenecked elsewhere in the system.


from https://docs.brilliantmonocle.com/monocle/monocle/#bluetooth...:

    It supports Bluetooth 5.2, up to 2Mb/s.
720p == 1280w x 720h * 3bytes (rgb) * 8bits/byte == 22.1Mb / frame

So video compression is going to have to get more than ~10x reduction to fit into 2Mb/s and that's just 1 frame/sec.


10x reduction from raw to jpg is not what worries me (provided decent-ish computing power) as much as that this is a theoretical maximum under lab conditions. When has any wireless technology ever delivered?

When 802.11n 300mbps was the hot thing that made LAN obsolete, you'd be happy to get 60 megabits (which is still plenty for most purposes, don't get me wrong, but it isn't 300). Bluetooth is more resilient due to spectrum hopping that I wish newer WiFis had taken over (no more channel madness where you either have to coordinate with 3d neighbors or, on auto, might have good and bad days; everything just uses the whole spectrum as efficiently as possible), but I still doubt you'll have one fps stable.


720p claim may be specific to the video recording features while the stills capture could be at the higher resolution. or they could just be over-sampling to help reduce with noise by down-scaling the larger resolution to the smaller.


It seems to me that unlike HoloLens and such, it's not trying to be seamless. It's almost entirely obstructing one eye with a small screen. They use a translucent case so you can sorta see around the screen, but not very well. Kinda butts up against what the actual promise of AR was supposed to be.


So basically the same experience as a thermal monocular. Which is pretty decent "augmented vision" once you get used to it.


To some extend. It would already be revolutional if they have an actual product instead of empty promises.


they provide a working service, which is a lot more than you can say about most startups today.

But they don't align with your political direction so they're grifters. You probably quit twitter too when musk took over, but are fine when the censorship was going the other way.


No, their whole thing is they are riding the coat tails of regressive mouth pieces that stupid people throw money at, so they are there peddling services and taking a cut. It is all a grift. Snake oil salesmen. CYA troll.


I don't understand the puzzle, the seed phrase words are in the text of the blog and we need to find which sentences are wrong and find each word?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: