Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more bcoates's commentslogin

Pumped out water has to go somewhere . With the airgap, it will either back out your garbage disposal or pour out your airgap into the sink basin, depending on the location of the blockage.

The airgap causes the pump to be physically incapable of backfeeding the drinking water supply with dishwasher waste


iirc its less about contaminating drinking water (there is a valve and pump to get through. rather tricky) and more about waste getting into dishwasher during cycle and you getting contaminated dishes.

my wife once decided to dump into garbage disposal a bunch of uncooked broccoli at once. it clogged garbage disposal and drain. when i tried to unclog it with plunger it backed into dishwasher (was hooked directly to garbage disposal bypassing airgap). took me hour to get everything out of dishwasher.


I think he said sharing a circuit with a fridge, which are generally 110 in the US -- i think this is how my apartment is wired (2-phase 30A to oven dedicated, one 20A for the whole rest of kitchen)

Trying to run a resistive heater on the same circuit as a fridge compressor without tripping leans towards very conservative wattage


That's funny. Code in Ontario Canada is that the fridge needs to be on its own circuit. It's funny because we have an extra-big-ass inverter drive fridge that never draws more than an amp or two, even at startup because it's inherently soft-start.

Just a waste of copper and a beaker really.


>Just a waste of copper and a beaker really.

But also helps avoid the case where your coffee maker trips the breaker shared with your refrigerator and you don't notice until the food in the refrigerator is warm. (which was a risk in my previous apartment - the counter circuits were shared with the refrigerator). I think it makes sense to have it as a separate circuit.


My thought was to share it with the lights, so you get an early indication if/when there is a fault than just your fridge going out.

> But also helps avoid the case where your coffee maker trips the breaker shared with your refrigerator and you don't notice until the food in the refrigerator is warm.

Didn’t notice the coffee was cold?

Overall, given the massive fears of a fridge failure, which can happen beyond just electrical failures, very very very few people have any kind of monitoring/alarming for this event. You’d think that would be the first requirement.


> counter circuits were shared with the refrigerator

Ouch. Code here (Ontario) is that not only does the fridge need a separate circuit, but counter outlets need two separate circuits: each socket on the duplex outlet is required to be on a separate circuit (although multiple outlets can all share the same two circuits, but you're supposed to alternate top and bottom).

Of course, if your home is older than I am or it's a handyman special, all bets are off. If I run the microwave while someone is vacuuming in another part of the house it'll trip the breaker.


Good point. I haven’t tripped a GFCI in a long while but I don’t actually know if my fridge will lose power when I do trip the GFCI. My guess is that it will since it does have a water line and ice dispenser so probably requires being wired into the same circuit.


Refrigerators have become incredibly efficient in the last 40 years. I mean incredibly.

It sounds like this law is outdated.


The only complaint I have about sharpies is the crap ergonomics on the barrel, causing people to wrap tape around it just to get a nice grip, which inevitably gets super gross:

https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/science.aan7026/full/lanl...


Yes, I was hoping to see some actual insight on this Domestic Manufacturing Miracle but it seems to just be "if you build it they will come"

This flies in the face of the more than one person I know personally that tried to take stranded US based manufacturing assets and turn them into something with a future. So far, no luck

I still believe there is upside in this space over the next decade or so but I haven't met anyone who's won in a repeatable way yet.


I suspect there is no steel going into a sharpie; tariffs on steel make it harder to build lots of things in the US.


Biggest tragedy of the Trump economy: the rhetoric is actually right on a number of these trade things, but the tariffs themselves are so goofy and scattershot and, I assume, influenced by corrupt favors, in that they target a ton of raw materials and inputs, hurting the very manufacturing industry they’re claiming to be trying to help.

A sane application of protectionism would be more like Britain in 1800 - Importing a ton of raw materials from overseas (e.g. cotton), and selling them the products made from them (textiles). Tariff Chinese washing machines but not foreign steel, magnets, and wire that we could use to make our own.

Aluminum, iron, and coal mining jobs, etc, are not what I want to add. Car factories on the other hand, sure. So far, the tariffs have been more likely to hurt those factories than help them.


I don't get it -- AWS deep archive is $12/TB/yr and provides actual durability and connectivity, not just drive-in-a-shoebox. That seems pretty hard to beat by buying raw storage at retail


AWS connectivity is stupidly expensive in the outgoing direction, so that connectivity may or may not be worth much of anything. Connectivity is also a risk.

Overall glacier is only really suited for backups, and I don't need that much durability for a single backup. And even if durability is a big deal, I can get there cheaper. Especially using a realistic expected life cycle and not the warranty period.


It's been closer to 100 years since we figured out information theory and discredited this idea (that continuous/analog processes have more, or different, information in them than discrete/digital ones)


In theory or in practice? Wouldn't the Nyquist frequency and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle put practical limits.


Also the persuasion paper he links isn't at all about what he's talking about.

That paper is about using persuasion prompts to overcome trained in "safety" refusals, not to improve prompt conformance.


Co-Author of the paper here. We don't know exactly why modern llms don't want to call you a jerk, or for that matter why persuasive techniques convince them otherwise. it's not a hard line like many of the guardrails. That said, I talked to Jesse about this, and I strongly suspect the same techniques will work for prompt conformance when the topic is something other than name calling.


isn't that just instruction fine tuning and rlhf inducing style & deference? why is that surprising


It's bc they are programmed to be agreeable and friendly so that you'll keep using them.


I think they're understating the thread safety risks here. The import is going to wind up happening at a random nondeterministic time, in who knows what thread holding who knows what locks (aside from the importer lock).

Previously, if you had some thread hazardous code at module import time, it was highly likely to only run during the single threaded process startup phase, so it was likely harmless. Lazy loading is going to unearth these errors in the most inconvenient way (as Heisenbugs)

(Function level import can trigger this as well, but the top of a function is at least a slightly more deterministic place for imports to happen, and an explicit line of syntax triggering the import/bug)


I don't think there is any solution for that but "fix your broken linter".


It isn't just one though. Every linter I've used has warned about that.

Probably because PEP 8 says

> Imports are always put at the top of the file, just after any module comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants


Ruff doesn't do this, and in fact even lets you specify modules that _must_ not be imported at the top level (banned-module-level-imports = [...])

I banished the worst/heaviest libraries to this list at my workplace and it's been really helpful at keeping startup times from regressing.


The idea of app timers seems like exactly the weird self-negotiation alcoholics do around booze where they think mimicking the habits of casual drinkers (on what is, to the casual, a bender) will make them not an alcoholic anymore.

Yes, normies might have three margaritas on a Tuesday. Like, once a quarter. Not every single day, and also not followed by a whole lot more once you’re loosened up.

Likewise, the reaction of a mentally stable person to TikTok is like the reaction of a normal person to a casino full of slot machines--discomfort and more than a little disgust. If you start wagging your tail to that shit, there is no safe level and you need to delete it all yesterday, app timers and clever little boxes are making you worse.


I get what you are saying but it’s 2025 and a mobile device is basically required to operate in society today. Especially if you want an active social life or to excel at work.

Nobody needs a margarita or any other addictive substance to function in society (barring actual substances issues). So it’s a false equivalence to compare apps like this.

An example in my middle aged life is that my kids extra-curriculars are all organized on WhatsApp. If I choose not to have a Meta account then my kids suffer when I am out of the loop on their events. Then of course all of the invites and venues are on Facebook. And all the parents post their pics to IG.

Because these apps are purposely designed to addict you, it is a real sticky thing to have to dip your toes in without getting sucked into a scrolling nightmare.


Well he didn't say the phone, but the app. So instead of using app timers just delete the app. The point is that you find yourself having a problem with the app and regret it's usage later then an app timer is the same as an alcoholic having one drink, now if you are judicious with the app timer and really do it ok. Same for an alcoholic, if you can actually have one drink, then it's fine.

Some apps are addictive but have some reasonable informational value. Some are just straight key bumps of entertainment with an algorithmic comedown to keep you looking for the next baggie.

I have the same situation you do about Facebook, but still don't have the app on my phone. I just check the mobile site and I was forced to install messenger. I have no need or desire to install things like TikTok or Instagram, of the hundreds of times people have sent me links to things on those apps I've never come away with the feeling that it was a value add.


It's a good idea to just uninstall some of these apps or even accounts and see if you really miss them. I found that not to be the case with Twitter and Facebook.


I do agree with your point about phones being necessary and that complicating the addiction but A) people absolutely made the same argument about alcohol in the past, that it was necessary for a social life and B) they were critical of the TikTok app specifically rather than phones as a whole in general.


I find them really useful, I find youtube to be a good thing in moderation. But its very helpful to have a timer forcing me to thoughtfully use the time I've allocated.


The "UnTrap"-Add-On for Firefox can block the more detrimental aspects of youtube, like shorts or the recommendation of other videos. I have it configured so that it always brings me directly to the "watch later"-playlist and I never go to the main page.


FreeTube is also phenomenal for de-enshittifying (dis-enshittifying?) the YouTube experience


I wish Chrome had timers for specific websites on mobile. I hate the all-or-nothing Chrome timer, it's ridiculous and so counter intuitive.


> I wish Chrome had timers for specific websites on mobile.

Chrome does have this feature on mobile, but perhaps not on your mobile.


this is the sole reason i default to Firefox on mobile as it allows extensions. And install a website restriction ext like Leechblock [1].

[1] https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/blaaajhemilngeeffpb...


I’d also like more control over chrome autocomplete.

Most of the time that I get sucked into a website, it’s because autocomplete and muscle memory got me there without thinking. Every once in a while I’ll clean out my history cache and for a week or so I’ll find myself on the page of google search results for “re” or “fa”


You can hold-press over an autocompleted URL to delete it, which has much less friction than clearing your history.


Agreed, and their setting to turn it off entirely doesn't work on Pixel at all.


Pixel phones (at least) have this.


"Normal" people don't react that way to casinos.


Have you walked past one recently? Casinos used to have at least some veneer of sophistication - polished wood, baize, well-dressed croupiers - even if it was ultimately pretty thin. Now the whole room looks like a giant kiddie noisemaker toy.


Aside from general infantilization, another theory: The old status-signalling has moved on to something else, and past generations' signals of upper-class (or at least classier) gambling are now obsolete, so nobody bothers projecting them.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: