What are the chances you were seeing the anti-civ bots and now reddit makes them easier to hide? (And I'm not saying regular people acting like bots, but an anti-civ campaign.)
Not exactly the same (it's about power rather than price). But close enough that when you said it, I thought, "oh! there is something like that." There's also more fundamental economics laws at play for supply and demand of a resource / efficiencies at scale / etc. Given our ever increasing demand of compute compared increasing supply (cheaper more powerful compute), I expect the supply will bottleneck before the demand does.
Chollet literally never says that. Quite the opposite. He says that AIs are currently abysmally bad at the skills this benchmark tests. An AGI should be able to do this, but doing this doesn't mean it's AGI. He has been very clear about that. I suggest you go back and (re)read the intro ARC-AGI paper.
No system can crack these out of the box (like humans can) because we don't have AGI.
This is the correct strategy for this particular game (center the mirrors between the yellow squares, move the black squares). I didn't realize it until about round 6 or 7.
Can AI models generalize+ at any long context problem solving and agency regardless of modality? I think the answer is no, and this is why they are not yet AGI.
reply