If you don't mind closed source paid app, I can recommend MacWhisper. You can select different models of Whisper & Parakeet for dictation and transcription. My favorite feature is that it allows sending the transcription output to an LLM for clean-up, or anything you want basically eg. professional polish, translate, write poems etc.
I have enough RAM on my Mac that I can run smaller LLMs locally. So for me the whole thing stays local
Maybe this sounds dark but see also how the net is tightening around phones that allow you to run open firmware after you've bought the hardware for the full and fair price. We're slowly being relegated to crappy hobbyist projects once the last major vendors decide on this as well, and I don't even understand what crime it is I'm being locked out for
We're too small a group for commercial vendors to care. Switching away isn't enough, especially when there's no solidarity, not even among hackers. Anyone who uses Apple phones votes with their wallet for locking down the ability to run software of your choice on hardware of your choice. It's as anti-hacker as you can get but it's fairly popular among the HN audience for some reason
If not even we can agree on this internally, what's a bank going to care about the fifty people in the country that can't use a banking app because they're obstinately using dev tools? What are they gonna do, try to live bankless?
Of course, so long as we can switch away: by all means. But it's not a long-term solution
I think pretty soon I'll carry a "normal" phone in my bag for things like communication and banking/ticketing, but I'll carry a device I actually like in my pocket. It'll be the best of both worlds - content I want to see often and easily in my pocket, and the stuff I don't want to be distracted by will be harder to reach on a whim.
Yes, I think I'll have to do the same. I've been in the market for a new phone but the one I had pretty much settled on removed the option to update the boot verification chain so I'm obviously not buying that. Might as well buy apple then
It seems like a finite solution though. Having a second phone is not something most people will do, so the apps that are relegated to run on such devices will become less popular, less maintained, less and less good
Currently, you can run open software alongside e.g. government verification software. I think it's important to keep that option if somehow possible
It a projection of what they could do. ie. logical step
The whole SafetyNet and "secure chain" things are PITA, eg. ChatGPT app wouldn't work if the phone bootloader isn't signed by Google. Lots of banking app wouldn't work, HSBC banking app for instance wouldn't allow login if Android developer mode is enabled.
Some apps do this because of some minor audit crap with relation to screenshots (the devmode part) afaik. Others just always blank the screen image and tell the auditor to [insert crude metaphor].
Same none sense with root enabled. You must have a check, doesn't specify which one and as long as you can show it works once you are fine.
The DGX Spark, Ascent GX10, and related machines have no relation to NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GB200. The chip they are based on is called GB10, and is architecturally very different from NVIDIA's datacenter solutions, in addition to being vastly smaller and less powerful. They don't have anything resembling the Grace CPU NVIDIA used in Grace Hopper and Grace Blackwell datacenter products. The CPU portion of GB10 is a Mediatek phone chip's CPU complex that metastasized, not NVIDIA's datacenter CPU cut down.
Mediatek is in the picture because NVIDIA outsourced everything in GB10 but the GPU to Mediatek. GB10 is two chiplets, and the larger one is from Mediatek. Yes, Mediatek uses off the shelf ARM CPU core IP, but they still had to make a lot of decisions about how to implement it: how many cores, what cluster and cache arrangements, none of which resemble NVIDIA's Grace CPU.
Thanks for the clarification. I was surprised to learn it is not a single chip; thought they did something akin to Apple Silicon integrating some ARM cores on their main chip. Kind of disappointing: they basically asked MediaTek to build a CPU with an NV-Link I/O.
The big picture is probably that GB10 is destined to show up in laptops, but NVIDIA couldn't be bothered to do all the boring work of building the rest of the SoC and Mediatek was the cheapest and easiest partner available. It'll eventually be followed by an Intel SoC with NVIDIA providing the GPU chiplet, but in the meantime the Mediatek CPU solution is good enough.
From NVIDIA's perspective, they need an answer to the growing segment of SoCs with decent sized GPUs and unified memory; their existing solutions at the far end of a PCIe link with a small pool of their own memory just can't work for some important use cases, and providing GPU chiplets to be integrated into other SoCs is how they avoid losing ground in these markets without the expense of building their own full consumer hardware platform and going to war with all of Apple, Intel, AMD, Qualcomm.
I think he was a patriot. That’s what made him so dangerous. He believed he had the best interests of the nation at heart. He probably convinced himself that Iraq really did pose a threat.
I bought Pebble time many years ago, it arrived with the front panel gaping open, it wasn't properly attached to the watch body. I emailed them about this and it took weeks for them to reply... giving me a boilerplate answer. I had to spam as many people in the company as I could including the CEO, to get a replacement.
Small companies making niche products should not get a pass when they have bad service just because it’s not made by one of the big guys.
Had the same crap experience with Thursday boots. The founder goes on podcasts touting nonsense thinking he is the next zappos while customer service is compete garbage when there is a problem.
I bought a pebble when it first came out. Loved it. But this new one is way too late and too expensive to care about.
There is a common sense to support indies therefore negative comments for improper customer support are seen as toxic activity by wide. Since you don't want to stress a single individual.
There are also big-corp. products which are intentionally killed or abandoned. Many people get damaged. In the end all of us pay some price for the sake of progress. Otherwise nobody would dare to innovate or try to sell new stuff.
I think it is “audience capture”, a lot of the “hackers” on here are adult children and can identify themselves too much with this little indie company. After all, they would execute decisions the same way they would have done; recklessly. It’s the tech bro spirit.
I have enough RAM on my Mac that I can run smaller LLMs locally. So for me the whole thing stays local