Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jcamlin's commentslogin

Sigmoid controller allocates timesteps by solution stiffness—same idea as Adam for gradients. Fixed hyperparameters across 5 orders of magnitude in Reynolds number. Matches NASA benchmark (Rε = 1.000) at 1/8th resolution on laptop. Code + data public - see zenodo and github repo link in paper (link)


The secret: T³ periodic domain + Fourier orthogonality = the weak solution is just a curve in coefficient space. Not a field. A curve. Temporal lifting samples that curve densely where it bends hardest. Standard DNS crashes from CFL blowup. This doesn't - because we're not fighting the geometry, we're riding it. Results:

Taylor-Green Re=10⁵: BKM=37.1, stable through full vortex-stretching cascade Kolmogorov Re=10⁸: 0.07% dissipation error 128³ grid → 411³ effective resolution (spectral super-resolution from temporal oversampling) Hardware: 8GB laptop, no GPU

No artificial dissipation. No hyperviscosity. Unmodified Navier-Stokes unlike all other DNS. GitHub link to code and data in the paper (linked)


What's the significance of those particular Reynold's numbers? 10^8 seems high for incompressible flow, but maybe I misread something.


> because we're not fighting the geometry, we're riding it

Don’t let ChatGPT write summaries for you (please edit the comment to be real)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: