> This site was created with human vision and AI assistance.

Nothing to be surprised of.

I'll admit that this might be part of the profound mysteries of Catholic Theology, but the "browse all concepts" page, https://theologyandcode.com/concepts, showed me 12 concepts on buttons, and also claimed to show me "25 of 26 concepts". It is a profound mystery as to why counting is so difficult.

It all makes sense when you remember that you're starting from the axiom that 3 = 1.

I recommend skimming through https://theologyandcode.com/concepts/trinity

Categories != Concepts

I think that should have been in one of the buttons, oh, another profound theological mystery!

Aren't you afraid of giving all the mysteries away? Shouldn't you at least say "spoiler alert" and ROT13 it?

How do you suppose someone goes back to viewing all categories without another button?

I assumed that was one of the profound theological mysteries.

Agree. In the hands of a seasoned dev not only does productivity improve but the quality of outputs.

If I’m working against a deadline I feel more comfortable spending time on research and design knowing I can spend less time on implementation. In the end, it took the same amount of time, though hopefully with an increase of reliability, observability, and extendibility. None of these things show up in the author’s faulty dataset and experiment.

Then there are those who are augmenting their winch with LLM usage.

> I stand by my assertion that these tools are all basically the same fundamental tech - LLMs.

Over generalizing. The synergy between the LLM and the client (cursor, Claude code, copilot, etc) make a huge difference in results.

I've had great results with the Amazon Q developer cli, ever since it became agentic. I believe it's using claude-3.7-sonnet under the hood.

+1 this has become my go to cli tool now, very impressed with it

How does it compare to Claude Code

I haven't used Claude Code. But one major difference is Q Cli is $19/month with generous limits.

Not as seamless as one might like. I stream games from my PC using moonlight. So far it's worked well.

I recently jumped ship from Apple to Android after being a diehard apple user for 10+ years. So far I am enjoying no longer being constrained by Apple's ecosystem and way of doing things. Worth noting Android and OS integrations are significantly less polished, but any technical user would be able to recreate the same features. I'm now using a S23Ultra + Tab S9 Ultra.

Genuine question, I’m in a similar position (gonna replace my still mostly perfectly working iPhone 7). Do you think the tradeoff of shorter device support times and less polish which leads to occasional frustration worth it? I mean, I can’t roll out my own solutions to everything, I simply don’t have time even while I’m able.

For the life of me I can't get excited about my Tab S9, though it works nicely with s22 ultra. The bizarre 16:10 wide-screen decision makes it so bad for reading, way worse than you would expect the the relatively small jump to get to a square-er resolution.

My thoughts exactly.

Surprisingly good. It's noticeable with some graphics intensive games, but I've never found it distracting.