isnt it what everyone that needs web validation does?

Yes its accurate. Ai is a zero sum game for the devs and as usual we cheered for it while they were feeding it all opensource projects

serious question why anyone on hn would run this?

Both replies to your question give you the two sides. It is a scary, stupid thing to give your house keys to, but it is also very interesting like two trains crashing.

Maybe a middle ground would be isolating it like the article suggests, and poking it with a stick (giving it limited, or newly created accounts) to see what it can do?

Right? It's asking for trouble.

I was in the repebble comments a few days ago and this person rolled their own for very obvious reasons: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47078454

It's fun to explore how we will communicate and work with our new AI colleagues. We discover with play and play is not always safe.

For me at least its an interesting project I can take apart and build on top of. I've built 100% my own agent frameworks from scratch and have learned a lot from them. There is something to be said on learning from others projects as well, also because its an ever evolving project with so many contributes whatever fork you go with of your own, theirs a good chance the new goodies will work with your own modified version. For example I'm looking in to LCM right now, and woo-dent you know it someone ported it to openclaw. But nanobot doesn't have it, so I'm considering working on the LCM port to that. If i succeed i will learn a lot and also contribute to progress in my own little ways.

lol. no one with common sense ever bought this story. you might have and your turning point might be this deal but for many the turning point was stealing data for training, advocating against china and calling them an adverse nation, pushing to ban opensource alternatives deeming them as "dangerous", buying tech bros with matcha popup in SF, shady RLHF and bias and millions others

it does not work like that except in a berkeley mba mind

he is worse than musk ever been. hiding behind ai

people downvoted me when i said this will happen and that they will also hve ads even tho they spend money saying they wont have. people believing anthropic are the same that put into office an old man with dementia

Which type of projects?

I also use Haiku daily and it's OK. One app is trading simulation algorithm in TypeScript (it implemented bayesian optimisation for me, optimised algorithm to use worker threads). Another one is CRUD app (NextJS, now switched to Vue).

Are you saying Haiku is better than Sonnet for some coding use? I've used Sonnet 4.5 for python and basic web development (pure JS, CCS & HTML) and had assumed Haiku wouldn't be very good for coding.

I'm saying Haiku isn't that bad, it's good enough for my needs, and it's the cheapest one. Maybe it's because I'm giving it small, well defined tasks.

I'm using Sonnet with a free account.

For Go code I had almost no issue. PHP too. apparently for React it's not very good.

The X grok feature is one of the best end user feature or large scale genai

What?! That's well regarded as one of the worst features introduced after the Twitter acquisition.

Any thread these days is filled with "@grok is this true?" low effort comments. Not to mention the episode in which people spent two weeks using Grok to undress underage girls.

high adoption means this works...

What is the grok feature? Literally just mentioning @grok? I don't really know how to use Grok on X.

That's news to me, I haven't read a single Grok post in my life.

Am I missing out?

im talking about the "explain this post" feature on top right of a message where groks mix thread data, live data and other tweets to unify a stream of information