or even if they are pro-gambling jeez would you never be able to work with someone you disagreed with politically

Having your job eligibility depend on your boss aligning with your personal morals on topics that have nothing to do with work is terrible

I'm surprised there's so much support for this in these HN comments.

Yes, I'm not so petty that I wish poverty upon everyone who holds a opinion different from mine!

I'm a live and let live kind of guy

And if they're not live and let live people? If they're working to ban or destroy something you value highly? To harm you or someone you care about?

thats reasonable, but its a question of degree. for me gambling and predictions markets dont meet that bar

Not wanting to work for someone or not wanting to hire someone is not equivalent to wishing poverty on them.

My daughter thinks shrimp are adorable little animals and doesn't eat them. That's a moral choice she has every right to make. She is not saying anyone who eats shrimp is a terrible person or trying to outlaw it.

trust the gooses

i just wish someone would explain why i prefer cline to claude code so much

Interesting that CRISPR was the top answer in 2015 too

lets be real we are gonna lose our jobs to these kids

Great name - Captain Hook recently hit public domain - would be a sick logo! (Disney stuff like red jacket still copywrited)

No way, that's awesome!

this happened to me. they refunded me after i contacted support!

Oceania has always been context engineering. Its been interesting to see this prioritized in the zeitgeist over the last 6 months from the "long context" zeitgeist.

article explains that it is not sizable

Can we get a shout out to the anti code review folks?

I think I can imagine them clearly, stay tuned.