The outer wrapper: science-flavored with no actual science.
It warms you up with feel-good nonsense designed to flatter the listener for being a responsible rich person and/or smarter than all those foolish poseurs with their fancy cars and houses.
Then telling you to avoid overt advertising because (the article claims) it just flatters your ego to trick you into buying something, followed by ...
New Age hokum repackaged as Buddhism lecture you're going to nod politely at as you scroll through without reading.
... and the punchline is an affiliate ad to buy enlightenment for $12
p.s. Overt advertising is a way of buying a piece of culture, you don't literally need to believe it for it to work so don't be smug if you don't "fall" for it. Affiliate marketing like this is a direct assault on your brain. This is the evil advertising you should be ignoring, not the "expensive stuff is expensive" ads they use as examples.
Can you respond to any of the actual statements in the article? I grant you a lack of citations in the post, but my understanding is that much of the science stuff (meditation, will power, conforming to those around us, effects of advertising, etc) is fairly well established. His advice is not vague, and many people have found positive benefits with those or similar strategies. Sure, there is some irony in the affiliate link to a book (it is a legitimate meditation book that is considered useful), but it doesn't affect the veracity of his statements.
My alarm bells usually start ringing when I see too much bolded text, capitalized text, or too many short sentences.
That said, I have to admit I do agree enough with the gist of the article, and the tips at the end for Headspace and Mindfulness in Plain English are decent. Using Headspace and researching/practicing mindfulness have been very beneficial to me.
Which kind of makes me feel worse about this thing as a whole. It just feels wrong.
I suspect there’s a marketing self-help book somewhere which recommends adding bold text a few times per paragraph to keep readers with short attention spans engaged.
Ha, agreed. It is one of those articles where as you are reading red flags start shooting up with an ever increasing frequency till eventually you are 2/3rd's of the way through and feel like you've been hoodwinked.
I'm pretty amused that you are downvoted here. I guess you phrased it too confrontationaly? or maybe something else. Hacker news is weird, sometimes.
But yeah, affiliate marketing is... well, it's important to be aware of who is paying the people who write what you are reading, and that is usually way less clear with affiliate marketing than with conventional advertising.
I don't generally struggle too much with the pull towards 'lifestyle inflation', but I have to say that after living in a dumpy neighborhood for several years, moving to a nicer area this year is something I've appreciated every single day.
There are trees and parks, lots of businesses and services right nearby, I save nearly an hour of each day with a shorter commute, it's quiet and clean and I feel safe walking around at night. Dollar for dollar the value has been very high for me, and I'm so thankful to have the means to choose where I want to live.
Just doesn't compute. We live in what the author would call a high income neighbourhood but that's because we wanted to live walking/bike distance to everything, which turns out to be a pretty frugal way to live. We have an old beater for a car and have never had any intention of trying to keep up with the rest of the street/neighbourhood. We see a lot of fancy around the place but meh.
Exactly. High income neighborhoods aren't just randomly scattered around. While I have no interest in living in a high income neighborhood per se, I want to bike to work, be away from major highways, have green spaces around my house, feel reasonably safe and be reasonably close to an at least a half way decent school and all places that fulfill those criteria are almost by definition high income neighborhoods.
I think that's part of the key, if you're going to try to outshine your neighbors you're only wasting money for a momentary victory. I had an uncle who told me he was glad he moved from the neighborhood he was in for that very reason.
A Dialogue from fight club movie:
==================================
Tyler Durden: Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off.
Since this is HN, it may be a good idea to port this to the tech community:
> Keeping up with the latest framework
I interviewed at a company that jumped on Silverlight on the very first day because they wanted to be "edgy". One of the interviewers was telling me how they used all resources to convert their enterprise CMS. But now most people left and they are having a hard time finding people who can convert it back.
Social status and programming tools are really comparable. Programming tools evolve so fast and they do help you, as more things are abstracted. However, there is still a necessity to to things the traditional way sometimes.
You should never model your life based on others' expectations.
You should certainly model it based on your own wants and preferences, but after giving it some thought first because what you think you want and why isn't necessarily what you really want and why.
For example, what does wealth mean? For someone, it can be that you can buy a BMW. However, if you want to buy a BMW you're never just buying a BMW: you're buying something else that actually satisfies you. The BMW is just a symbolic token for what you really want. If you know what that is then you also know whether buying that BMW is the right choice. It might be the perfect symbol for freedom or whatever in your life. Then go buy it. But you might be longing for something else and buying the car wouldn't eventually make you happier. Then you would be looking for something else again but as long as you don't know what you really want, you'll be shooting in the dark.
For me, wealth is independence. The more independent I am the wealthier I am. In corollary, people with FU money are the richest people on the Earth on that scale. Myself, I'd happily live cheaply if that meant I could basically choose what to do instead of having to work to keep up with my spending. Once in a while I count how much would I need to own to produce capital income that would give me a basic standard of living and the money for some hobbies I'm interested in without constantly having to think much about money.
Maybe status is worth something for someone. Maybe if you show status (buy that BMW) and hang around with people wealthier than you, some of it actually sticks and you gain even higher income and status because of your connections, eventually. Or maybe, by looking for other people's acceptance by the token of status, you're just trying to find a way to convince yourself that you're perfectly okay yourself and accepted just as you are. Then it might be less painful to deal with that first instead of hunting status for half of your life.
For a better take on this, read Stanley's "The Millionare Next Door". That book is based on actual research and interviews with large numbers of people. There are many people who have money, but don't show it.
Ok, what are you supposed to spend your money on then? I wonder if the author realizes you can't take your money with you when you die. Is the point of money to just accumulate it and then pass off the balance to someone else?
Even if you have rock solid financial security, it'll one day be shattered when your health inevitably becomes poor and you die. Your net worth will become zero no matter what you do.
One said time, which I agree with, but I'll add stability and power. Having enough money to live for 10+ years unemployed is nice when suddenly your current job is driving you nuts. Or you want to hop into a new field. Or start a sustainable privately-owned company that doesn't need / couldn't benefit from VC-style growth.
Having more stuff doesn't make one happier by default. Stability is more important. The tradeoff is status among certain groups of people; and if you care, then keep doing what you're doing I guess.
I think the point was more "don't spend because it's implied you need to spend" and instead just take time to think a bit about what you actually want/need. If you don't succumb to frivolous spending, that's great!
A lot of people have issues with frivolous spending though, and those who should be very well off based on their salary end up living paycheck to paycheck while accumulating things that just end up in storage or in a pile. Eating out all the time, buying stuff just because it's on sale, getting the newest and latest/greatest just because, it happens all the time and so much effort gets put into collecting and curating a mass of "stuff" that doesn't really ever prove valuable to the buyer. The author talks about the "keeping up with the Joneses" phenomenon, but it doesn't even have to be that expensive. Just look at how popular the "____"-crate market was for awhile. (still is?)
Neither the author nor myself is advocating that everyone must live a spartan lifestyle, but simply to review what it is you do put time, energy, and money into.
Time. I'm lucky I get to trade some money for time. Instead of spending the weekend cleaning my house I can pay someone fortnightly to do it for me. I can pay for a meal to be delivered to me if I don't want to cook for myself. I can pay for my groceries to be delivered to save me having to wait in line at the store.
Financial independence and for some: early retirement. You die when you die, but you can spend decades of your life free if you earn a decent salary and control your spending. Time is the most scarce resource we have. Money does equal time, so when you spend your money, you spend your life.
I remember reading a quote years ago that went something like this:
If you give someone complete freedom to do what they wish 95 percent of the time they will end up attempting to copy the behavior of those around them. (can't remember who said it or where I read it)
I remember thinking that it sounded "spot on"...my opinion hasn't changed much...a couple of generations ago it was called "Keepin up with the Jones's"...keeping up with your neighbors...
Add access to the Internet... An unlimited number of "Jones's" to keep up with...who to emulate now?
Your comments are quite striking in their (over)use of ellipses... I've been wondering if there's a particular reason you do this? At the very least they make your contributions distinct, I guess.
My hope is that it helps me keep my comments as "honest" as possible...
An ellipsis simply indicates an omission has occurred...in the case of my writing it simply means that a thought popped into my mind that I considered including to better illustrate the point I'm hoping to make, then decided against it, and wrote something else...
I've written that way for a number of years, mostly with good results...if it's distracting to anyone my apologies...
Perhaps that's why Cormac McCarthy is likely my favorite author...he's well known for short incomplete sentences, yet the "spell" (continuous dream) his writing invokes in readers is never broken...
JFTR, I was writing this way well before I began reading his works...
I get it, but it's a very one sided view that doesn't account for the value of a capital asset. Despite the greatest real-estate crash in the history of the US in which only one of my bordering neighbors didn't go into foreclosure, my $500K home, just eight years after I bought it has appreciated a bit more than 5% a year and before the crash was going up between 10-15% a year. Considering my loan has been at 2.65% (I got lucky with a non-subprime ARM which adjusted down) and property taxes are at 0.7% it's been a much better investment than a less expensive home. Yeah, it worked out for me, but it turns out it worked for all of my neighbors who also weathered the storm as well as a lot of other people through history.
> We are hard-wired to follow crowds. That’s what ensured our survival in the past. We have mirror neurons in our brain. The sole purpose of these neurons is to mimic other people’s behavior (and choices). Your willpower does not stand a chance against thousands of years of evolution.
This is not entirely correct. I mean it`d be difficult but not impossible.
He was generalizing. In general, people feel strong compulsions to assimilate with those around them and most of the time will do so to at least a certain degree.
Proper qualifying every statement would turn the simplest of blog posts into a massive manuscript! Hence we must be a little charitable when reading.
Some things that you buy have massive utility. A nice house can improve family dynamics, a big garden can make your kids healthy, a nice suit (and watch) can get you a better job.
Some things are silly, but alot depends on who you are and what your plan is.
Duh, you should live how you want to, not how others want you to live.
Also you should not date/marry a girl which only likes you if you drive a specific car A, live in neighboorhood B, earn C and maintain society status Z.
You should work on your social skills if you can only get your neighbours to like you if you drive the same car as them or earn more/thesame than them. If they really dislike you because you are poorer than them or drive an older yet safe car they aren't worth the effort.
The outer wrapper: science-flavored with no actual science.
It warms you up with feel-good nonsense designed to flatter the listener for being a responsible rich person and/or smarter than all those foolish poseurs with their fancy cars and houses.
Then telling you to avoid overt advertising because (the article claims) it just flatters your ego to trick you into buying something, followed by ...
New Age hokum repackaged as Buddhism lecture you're going to nod politely at as you scroll through without reading.
... and the punchline is an affiliate ad to buy enlightenment for $12
p.s. Overt advertising is a way of buying a piece of culture, you don't literally need to believe it for it to work so don't be smug if you don't "fall" for it. Affiliate marketing like this is a direct assault on your brain. This is the evil advertising you should be ignoring, not the "expensive stuff is expensive" ads they use as examples.