So if one add-on gets special permissions, then they actually ALL get that permission. Well, it could be worse. I'd hate to scare people away from installing add-ons. I mean, it's already scary and hard enough.
I was actually impressed that pcworld covered this story, which is part of why I used their link. I didn't see it anywhere else! Is there an official HN policy on what the "canonical link" is for a thing?
Not a strict policy, but if the article points to a more substantive source and the audience is capable of absorbing it (i.e. not too highly specialized and/or in a field that is widely understood here), we tend to swap for that.
