That's something of a no true Scotsman argument, where any compromise offered by the other side can be rejected as unreasonable.
Besides, why should we be expected to compromise on our civil rights? What other civil right could acceptably be demolished over time?
That's something of a no true Scotsman argument, where any compromise offered by the other side can be rejected as unreasonable.
Besides, why should we be expected to compromise on our civil rights? What other civil right could acceptably be demolished over time?