Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I kinda feel the most ethical thing for an author to do is focus on a recommendation for the best book that isn't theirs (e.g. besides my book X, I'd recommend Y for Z reasons).


Why would they have bothered writing the book if others existed?

Or, if better books existed after they wrote theirs, why would they bother mentioning theirs at all?


You can acknowledge that someone else's book is well-written, accurate, and valuable even if you think yours is better, or has a different focus, or a different pedagogical method, or...


The rules for the list don't say that an author can't recommend his/her own book. The rules do say that a recommender must explain why he/she recommends one book over others, which this author did.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: