I think this program is dumb and I don't support implementing it. We could easily make our lives worse by implementing various hypervigilant safety measures: no sugary drinks, no distilled alcoholic beverages, no showers without handrails, no pit bulls, and so on. Most people won't vote for such programs because they don't want to live that way. Life is inherently risky, and re-evaluating every activity in terms of someone's right to avoid a tiny probability of accidental death in order to foist a utilitarian orthodoxy on the public is a stupid fad that needs to die. People already voted against Jimmy Carter's lower-all-the-speed-limits programs in the '70s, there's no reason to revive that losing culture war. We have real problems, like climate change, racial inequality and unsustainable land use, and as long as reformers refuse to acknowledge the hamburger problem --

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/07/josh-barro-democrats-...

-- we'll never get the political support we need to solve them.