Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bravo, everyone on the PC side has great options now, but I feel for Mac "Professionals". Sad they just got straddled with the horrendous over priced and under performing Xeon platform. It boggles my mind why Apple would release a $6k model that will get trounced by these chips for a fraction of the price. I know the expand-ability is what you are buying into, but I imagine 90% of Mac Pro customers could care less about terrabytes of memory or a video solution that improves current vram limits. Add to all of that the gimped performance you are going to get on the Intel parts with the latest security patches.


I feel for Mac "Professionals". Sad they just got straddled with the horrendous over priced and under performing ____ platform.

Funny, but by making the name of the platform a blank, this applies just as much to 2005 as it does to 2019.

http://lowendmac.com/2015/remembering-the-final-powerpc-macs...


Apple must have had an interest in going with AMD - the fact that they didn't makes me think that getting macOS ready as a productive, reliable OS on AMD CPUs isn't as trivial as we might assume. Also, is Thunderbolt even an option with AMD?


Isn't the iMac a better option then the Mac Pro? It certainly is from a performance per buck option, but perhaps just in general?


I see no reason why that should be a problem. And yes, AMD has thunderbolt too.


I think you nailed it... Thunderbolt is not possible on AMD.


It is...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: