IQ tests are ridiculous and unscientific. Comparing cross-species capacity has no point or relevance or i'm not sure why you did it.

Comparing humans to other humans, as I suggested, is flawed as well. If you go by "ability to do something well-paid" like coding, then you have the definition SV gives to intelligence. However made of these individuals are completely lacking in social/artistic/humor and other forms of intelligence.

Like I said, intelligence is not a single thing, and if it was it would be impossible to accurately measure.

I've killed enough SV sacred cows for one post, go ahead with your downvoting.

It's the new woke thing to downplay human intelligence in comparison to other species and AI.

So you wouldn't say "Human intelligence is singularly spectacular and bridging the gulf between human and goldfish intelligence would be harder than traveling from one edge of the universe to another". You would say "Human and goldfish are smart at different things. Goldfish are smart at breathing in water and humans are smart at.. being smart".

I find this unnecessarily condescending. If you want to honestly characterize the argument, you could use realistic examples of intelligence. For instance: Goldfish brains are probably more adept at integrating their particular sensory environment than ours would be. Humans excel at navigating our symbolic and memetic social environment which lies completely outside the realm accessible to the goldfish.

We are definitely the smartest things in our known universe. But we will, by definition, not know what we can't know. So our universe is limited, and we are the only ones keeping score.

It's woke to respect other related biological systems. Respect doesn't imply a reduction to absurdity.

> It's the new woke thing to downplay human intelligence in comparison to other species and AI.

So you just argue against what you think someone else thinks, is that how this website works?

Kinda the same as all the other ones, frankly.