Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No they are saying that since 0% false positives is not possible we still need to browse the spam folder which defeats the whole point.

If there is a subset of messages for which we can be 100% then these messages don't need to be stored.



An imperfect classification is still useful. I can focus on messages that are more likely to be important most days, and only check the spam folder once a week or so. Checking the spam folder generally requires little attention and can be scheduled for when I'm tired/distracted/whatever.


Searching the spam folder is a source of entertainment to me. Every so often I'll get an especially elaborate one, they're pretty funny to read sometimes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: