Yep, you are basically making a new requirement that hires have to be Starcraft experts; and if not, then your naming scheme is totally unintuitive and overly verbose.
I'm a big fan of the function###.IATA (or ICAO) code.
So like db1.pao, web3.sfo, m22.sin...
I don't do the 01 02 thing because that falls down at 99. :-)
I'm a big fan of the function###.IATA (or ICAO) code.
So like db1.pao, web3.sfo, m22.sin...
I don't do the 01 02 thing because that falls down at 99. :-)