Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ditto. They're Berg connectors or, just as often, we're using the latched Molex SL, which is compatible most ways.

"Dupont" is exclusively a Chinese-ism in my experience, along with saying "buckled" instead of "latched" and "welded" instead of "soldered".



Great observation and makes total sense, although IMHO it does not conflict with the point made in the article. It could well be the first adopters of these in China had indeed known them by the DuPont name due to the reasons explained in the article, then inadvertently participated in its spread.

On a side point, I call these "Taobao-ism" or "Aliexpress-ism". It may sound backwards, but the "cargo cult" days of practical EE ("shanzhai") have clearly shown a strong influence on the vast majority of EE colloquial corpus widely in use even to this day.

For non-Mandarin speakers out there:

"buckle", "latch" <---> "扣" (= attach / snap in place)

"weld", "solder" <---> "焊" (= join by molten metal)


> They're Berg connectors

The article claims they're not compatible with Berg connectors. Is it wrong?


The 3.5" floppy drive connector that everyone calls a Berg connector: Not interchangeable, but can be shoved on in a pinch. Same pin spacing.

The ubiquitous series of ribbon IDC connectors and corresponding board-side headers also made by Berg? Totally intermixable with "dupont".

Bergstrip? AKA header pins, the ever-present companion of "dupont" connectors. 100% the same stuff.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: