Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's the end of this line of thinking, 12 trillionaires that own all the automation and a vast mass of unemployed people?


Yes, of course. Why should this not be the goal? If machines can replace all work, you say it’s a better option to keep work around?


Yes with heavy taxation used to fund a basic income for everyone. I doubt it'll ever be that simple; services still occupy the majority of the US economy. But there's no point keeping work alive just to have people work.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: