It could be easily argued that nuclear bombs are one of, if not the, most significant inventions in the past century, and their existence continues to have a singnificant geopolitical impact. I think it's safe to say that the vast majority of humanity is ideologically opposed to their use.
BUT, they're one of, if not _the_ most important technological invention that currently effect us. So, that trumps ideological and legal hurdles, and thus we should use them.... right?
I would like to presume you would disagree with that assertion.
With that in mind, would you like to reconsider your justification for continuing to use GitHub?
To be clear, I'm not arguing that you shouldn't use GitHub. I'm arguing that the importance, or impact, of an invention is irrelevant to its continued use.
What's important is the short, and long term _effect_ of continuing to use it.
BUT, they're one of, if not _the_ most important technological invention that currently effect us. So, that trumps ideological and legal hurdles, and thus we should use them.... right?
I would like to presume you would disagree with that assertion.
With that in mind, would you like to reconsider your justification for continuing to use GitHub?
To be clear, I'm not arguing that you shouldn't use GitHub. I'm arguing that the importance, or impact, of an invention is irrelevant to its continued use.
What's important is the short, and long term _effect_ of continuing to use it.