This is one of those things everyone told the allegedly "open" AMP project was a very, very bad idea, and the AMP project lead basically told everyone Gmail was doing it whether people liked it or not, and then insinuated anyone who had an issue with it was violating the Code of Conduct.
It’s quite astonishing to think how divorced from reality you must be to see how badly the whole AMP thing has gone and think “Yup AMP for gmail. That’s what we need.”
Don't forget all questions about this were ignored, issues on GutHub were closed, and then the project lead wrote a self-congratulatory blog post on how the whole AMP process is open and transparent.
