The thrust of his arguement is that since he believes Jessica is more notable than he is, and wikipedia has an existing article about him then his opinion should count.
However, an alternative conclusion could be that he isn't notable by wikipedia's standards and his article should also be deleted.
That's not the point he's making, please re-read the article. He included the specific reasons he believes Jessica to be notable (with proper references).
However, an alternative conclusion could be that he isn't notable by wikipedia's standards and his article should also be deleted.