Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting. You point all the bad things the author did in regard to wikipedia's process, which I suppose is fair. But at the same time, you don't really make a compelling argument that the person in question doesn't belong in wikipedia.

Should I take this to mean that the merits of the article in question are secondary to Wikipedia's processes?



I will take your comment as your ability to ignore all the comments showing how the article was correctly deleted.


You might also take it as my inability to see comments that didn't yet exist.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: