According to the National Council for Animal Protection, over 99% of beef farmed for meat comes from cows that live in horrific factory farm environments.

Does the remaining 1% matter all that much in the conversation?

Would you expect the National Council for Animal Protection to give you an unbiased figure?

I struggle with the concept of feedlot farming being morally acceptable at all. However, I've been on a number of beef farms in the UK and it's just not representative of how British beef is raised.

That number is probably true for the USA only. GP specifically said:

> Much of the world does not dump fertilizer on land, grow crop, and feed it to cattle.

does the national council for animal protection sound like they do independent research?

> Both are only relevant if you grain feed, instead of allowing animals to graze on grass.

Plot twist: the average US/EU diet can't be sustained on free range only meat/animal products.

In the US grass fed beef represent 4% of beef sold, and that's with a very loose definition of "grass fed"

https://agfundernews.com/grass-fed-beef-survey-story

Is that representative, there are areas in California where grazing was eliminated and they are not overrun with other grazing animals and beautiful meadows and creeks have begun to recover.

> only relevant if you grain feed, instead of allowing animals to graze on grass.

What's the percentage of grass fed vs grain? From a shallow search it seems like it's low single digits yet I see this argument come up a lot. Do you have different numbers perhaps?