> I have to bring you around with me to decide whether the venus de milo or a copy of playboy ca. 1975 is pornography
Why would any child need to be put in such a place that we need to decide whether that material constitute pornography in the first place?
Your second point is invalid (and disrespectful towards The Creator obviously). Gender and sex are tied together. Effeminate men or masculine women are a thing, but they are men and women at the end of the day. There is no such thing as "penis on a girl", other than being a mental illness. It's called gender dysphoria.
> So nazi's were never racist or oppresive?
Nazism is not a race or sex or color or other immutable part of someone. It's an ideology that one can choose whether to ascribe to it or not. This is so obvious.
Why would any child need to be put in such a place that we need to decide whether that material constitute pornography in the first place?
Your second point is invalid (and disrespectful towards The Creator obviously). Gender and sex are tied together. Effeminate men or masculine women are a thing, but they are men and women at the end of the day. There is no such thing as "penis on a girl", other than being a mental illness. It's called gender dysphoria.
> So nazi's were never racist or oppresive?
Nazism is not a race or sex or color or other immutable part of someone. It's an ideology that one can choose whether to ascribe to it or not. This is so obvious.