Fear not, as your reply is perfectly organized to me :-)
It is all the more interesting because it goes to the point I willfully chose not to make in my previous comments, namely that Mac OS X (in its current form at least) is unfit for most server roles. I think that there is a use case for SOHO and that even then it needs improvements to seriously tackle that area.
For developers and hackers by large it's more than adequate though.
> in response to OS running better on PC hardware than Linux
The exact phrasing would rather be "running better on my PC hardware" :-) as it's of course purely anecdotal evidence.
> I am hard pressed to buy that without more detail of your exact issues.
I started writing something, but it's really growing out of scope, so I will probably end up writing a full-blown post about it (which includes details about window managers)
PS: Awesome rocks and is one of my WM of choice, together with xmonad.
Fear not, as your reply is perfectly organized to me :-)
It is all the more interesting because it goes to the point I willfully chose not to make in my previous comments, namely that Mac OS X (in its current form at least) is unfit for most server roles. I think that there is a use case for SOHO and that even then it needs improvements to seriously tackle that area.
For developers and hackers by large it's more than adequate though.
> in response to OS running better on PC hardware than Linux
The exact phrasing would rather be "running better on my PC hardware" :-) as it's of course purely anecdotal evidence.
> I am hard pressed to buy that without more detail of your exact issues.
I started writing something, but it's really growing out of scope, so I will probably end up writing a full-blown post about it (which includes details about window managers)
PS: Awesome rocks and is one of my WM of choice, together with xmonad.