I notice the /s but I think for real, there's no point doing the find step if you have access to an AI. You'll just ask it to generate the story you want.
It is quite astounding how blatantly you missed the point of the entire article. Let me post a snippet in case you skipped over it by accident:
> So books, from Blood Meridian to Hop on Pop, are in part a dialogue between writer and reader. But the machines generating these stories cannot participate in a dialogue. They’re Mechanical Turks, guessing what word comes next based on a mix of complex math and the labor of Kenyan contractors paid less than $2 an hour to make sure the responses aren’t too racist.
You cannot simply ask an AI to generate a story that carries any sort of meaning.
> You cannot simply ask an AI to generate a story that carries any sort of meaning.
First, AI stories don't have to be one prompt wonders where it does everything. It can be an iterative, or curated, process guided by a person. Second, AI is perfectly capable of putting together words that carry meaning. What magic sauce do your collection of words have that an AI wouldn't? They can quite possibly be the same exact words.
