Please read my post again, especially the last part...

I have read your post. Apologies if I’ve misunderstood it, but just replying in that way doesn’t really help.

I'm confused because I didn't say that Rust makes refactoring a breeze right? In fact, I said it does the opposite. So I don't really understand your response.

Ah, I read "I use exactly that way of error handling..." as "I use exactly that way of error handling [in Rust]..." (given the post you were replying to), but I guess you were talking about Zig. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Haha, I'm actually using neither Rust nor Zig and I think both don't support the way of error-handling that I described.

No worries, happens. :)