Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why should the government administer an airport terminal? It is ultimately a place for private businesses (airlines) to have reception and waiting rooms. I'd argue that the airlines should be buying their own land and building their own airports. Of course it makes sense (except maybe the busiest airports) for the different airlines to share a runway, and so it start to look like a public place. Airports are not public places though, and so I don't see why local governments should administer them (the FAA does have some safety operations at an airport).

While your typical playground makes sense for the city to administer, if the park is really a zoo it makes more sense for the city to not run it at all. However since the city benefits from the zoo it does make sense for the city to help the private zoo get started in a good location.



That's a great case for the abolishing the TSA and having private firms take over airport security.


Yeah, the reason I didn't include airports in my list is because I agree that the case that these should be government run is much weaker.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: