The Chinese room is not saying humans are smart. It is showing the difference between knowledge and action.
Understanding a language is distinct from responding to language prompts.
Unless you are claiming LLM is AGI which is a laughable proposition the fact that people say LLM isn't intelligent isn't impactful on whether AGI isn't intelligent.
There isn't disagreement (outside extremists) that AGI doesn't exist yet. The only disagreement is "when do we know it does".
Not having a test isn't hubris. It instead shows it is a fundamentally hard question. What does intelligence mean?
Understanding a language is distinct from responding to language prompts.
Unless you are claiming LLM is AGI which is a laughable proposition the fact that people say LLM isn't intelligent isn't impactful on whether AGI isn't intelligent.
There isn't disagreement (outside extremists) that AGI doesn't exist yet. The only disagreement is "when do we know it does".
Not having a test isn't hubris. It instead shows it is a fundamentally hard question. What does intelligence mean?