Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's confusing about how having more money might let you hire more people to build more things or build things faster?

If something is an obvious winner - why handicap it by limiting investment to what it can make on its own?

What if it relies on network effects, or economies of scale?



> If something is an obvious winner

As much as founders think otherwise (they have to!), there is no such thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: