This is just an insanely vague and worthless notice. And it is infuriating that healthcare customers are made vulnerable by the vendors used by insurers like Cigna or whoever.
Change is so disingenuous that they admit the following was stolen:
> Health information (such as medical record numbers, providers, diagnoses, medicines, test results, images, care and treatment)
But claim with a straight face that no “full medical histories” were compromised. What sort of two faced word game are they playing? Those ARE full medical histories.
And of course due to vague partnerships between other hospitals and them, like the University of Washington hospitals, people who were never their customers also were affected.
This has to stop and it has to happen through regulation, fines, jail time, all retroactively applied. All these companies underfund security because posting a notice and offering credit monitoring is all it takes to move on.
This is just an insanely vague and worthless notice. And it is infuriating that healthcare customers are made vulnerable by the vendors used by insurers like Cigna or whoever.
Change is so disingenuous that they admit the following was stolen:
> Health information (such as medical record numbers, providers, diagnoses, medicines, test results, images, care and treatment)
But claim with a straight face that no “full medical histories” were compromised. What sort of two faced word game are they playing? Those ARE full medical histories.
I also saw recently that Fred Hutch was also compromised: https://www.fredhutch.org/en/about/about-the-hutch/accountab...
And of course due to vague partnerships between other hospitals and them, like the University of Washington hospitals, people who were never their customers also were affected.
This has to stop and it has to happen through regulation, fines, jail time, all retroactively applied. All these companies underfund security because posting a notice and offering credit monitoring is all it takes to move on.