You should probably RTFA before making broad assumptions on their solution and how it works. Most of what you wrote is both incorrect and addressed in the article.
Telling people to RTFA is against site guidelines. And I read the entire article before making this comment. If you think I’m wrong, you reply with what’s wrong, not some useless “you’re wrong, RTFA”.
The only thing in my comment that’s not directly based on the article is a handwavy 1ms/request saving estimate, and since they don’t provide any measurement, it’s anyone’s guess.
Is telling the people to RTFA against the guidelines?
The guideline specifically advises to do what GP did: Instead of commenting whether or not someone read the article, to tell them that article answers their questions.
