Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> is to use the tunnel to transmit actual data at the application level.

Isn't that exactly what ServerAliveInterval does? The man page says: "ssh(1) will send a message through the encrypted channel". A plain TCP keepalive wouldn't count as being "through the encrypted channel".



Honestly at this point Im out of date, but autossh also takes care of bugs or connection issues within the ssh link itself


So does ssh now.

So much smoke & obfuscation. Autossh itself mentions ServerAliveInterval. It's worked flawlessly on all kinds of dodgy connections for me.

If anyone has any damned bug reports, link them.


I don't know if I would call it smoke and obfuscation, at the time systemd was not widely deployed and the ssh functionality was not as developed, so it made sense to use autossh. Now it sounds like it doesn't make sense anymore. It happens.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: