Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can't they do the same thing with statement credits? I got a Pixel on Google Fi that was $X and over the next 24 months I will get a statement credit of $X/24, so after two years it will be "free" if I stay with Google until then. Otherwise, I paid the difference.


Consumers, especially lower-income ones, mostly look at the sticker price. Paying upfront and getting a discount later is the opposite of what they want and carriers know this.


What do you mean? This is what they’re doing. “Switch to [carrier name] and get the iPhone 16 Pro on us!” Then it’s explained that it’s all statement credit to cover the purchase price over X months.


There's two ways "statement credits" can work (which is a little confusing).

A. Pay money upfront and get a discount every month.

B. Pay nothing upfront but the service is full price. (This is what I see on the T-Mobile site.)

My point is that many people prefer B even if the total cost is higher.


Right. I know of no consumer products that are sold using way “A” as you describe it.


Google Fi apparently because Google always has to be different.


Holy shit is that how that works? To be fair, it does say $500 back over 24 monthly bill credits, so it’s not overly misleading.

Not trying to move goal posts though. You’re right about that one and it’s pretty shitty.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: