Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From your link:

Four Pillars of Social Mobility: To rank each state, we measured a series of indicators related to social mobility across four pillars: Entrepreneurship and Growth, Institutions and the Rule of Law, Education and Skills Development, and Social Capital. Scores for each pillar were combined and weighted equally to create a state’s overall social mobility score.

I would think a measure of social mobility would include income percentile vs parents' income percentile.



Here, this one uses the simplest metric possible; a poor child is much more likely to remain poor in the US than in the other rich western countries looked at.

https://www.businessinsider.com/american-dream-social-econom...

https://osf.io/preprints/osf/tb3qz_v1


Only if you're trying to be objective. "Social mobility" in this case is their invented metric to arrive at their prearranged outcome for the study.


> percentile vs parents' income percentile.

Wouldn't this be a much worse metric? It would have to net out to zero change on average by the definition of percentiles. If we take abs change to look at both downward and upward mobility, the measure wouldn't tell us where most downward mobility happened, up and down could all happen within the bottom 25% and none in the top 75% and this metric would say we are highly social mobile if there was a lot of movement there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: