At no point did I suggest he was doing something that wasn't voted for.
I merely suggested that what was happening seemed at odds with the intent of the founders of the United States, in that even in 18th century England it would have been perceived as vast over-reach of a monarch to behave in a similar manner.
If you're all happy with it, fine. It just seems remarkable, hence my original comment.
You don't think people should be able to vote to break laws, but objectively, people can vote for literally any reason they please. There are no laws regulating how voters choose to vote, nor could there be.
I never voted for Trump, but I did vote for my state to defy federal cannabis laws. Guess what, my vote to shit on federal laws was legal.
I expect that you intended to say "textbook definition of democracy", but the Freudian slip is quite something.