Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Curious if anyone can weigh in on why Flix requires a developer to explicitly mark a function as pure. I'd imagine in almost all cases this can be derived through static analysis.


I think if you mark a function as pure the compiler guarantees that this is indeed the case.


I could be wrong, but the sentence "Flix precisely tracks the purity of every expression in a program." together with some examples of function definitions without the purity/impurity annotation, gave me the impression it's optional, because the compiler can infer it on its own most of the time.


Just like const, private and static.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: