You misunderstood everything to the point I think you're doing it on purpose.
I like TBD, but the article is NOT about TBD.
> are you saying I just imagined
I use TBD for everything and I like it. I was talking about the writer of the article, not you. The article is, again, NOT about TBD and the writer, most likely an overpriced consultant, is very confused about branching strategies, and most likely believe that a daily standup or some pair programming is part of that strategy. His other articles confirm this.
You said it was limited to web projects, I said I had used it in non-web projects and it wasn’t limited to web projects, and you said “it definitely is”. How else am I meant to interpret that? You are directly saying that what I have personally experienced isn’t possible.
> The article is, again, NOT about TBD and the writer, most likely an overpriced consultant, is very confused about branching strategies, and most likely believe that a daily standup or some pair programming is part of that strategy.
This does not resemble the article we are commenting on.
I like TBD, but the article is NOT about TBD.
> are you saying I just imagined
I use TBD for everything and I like it. I was talking about the writer of the article, not you. The article is, again, NOT about TBD and the writer, most likely an overpriced consultant, is very confused about branching strategies, and most likely believe that a daily standup or some pair programming is part of that strategy. His other articles confirm this.