>> Our smartest, fastest, and most useful model yet

> I'd say it's definitely supposed to be the best, it just doesn't deliver.

What part of "Our" is difficult to understand in that statement? Or are you claiming that OpenAI owns another model that is clearly better than GPT-5?

Not the person you were responding to but, if a company provides a service, they want you to use it instead of their competitors. No company is going to say “use ours unless you want to use the best, then use our competitor’s”. so even though I agree with you that they are not explicitly saying “this is the best model in the world”, they are definitely saying “hey this is the best we got, use it”.

Ah so your reading of that statement is "our best, which we acknowledge is not THE best, but it's not supposed to, it's supposed to be cost effective"?

I would suggest reading the entire comment thread before attacking people.

I was going by what sama was saying on twitter. he was mostly hyping the cost-effectiveness of it. which can be considered a factor what is "best" too.