Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> this model is not designed for complex conversational use cases

... but it's also the perfect choice for creative writing ...?

Isn't this a contradiction? How can a model be good at creative writing if it's no good at conversation?



I think they mean it's not designed to be able to converse with the user over long/complex topics, but it can generate fictional conversations fine.


Not necessarily. Where do you think the overlap is between these two tasks?


Good question! The overlap is a very interesting space.

Perhaps the overlap is where human input and oversight becomes valuable: in terms of veracity, trust, relevance, interestingness, etc


Yeah, I guess "creative writing" in this case is a shortcut for essentially saying they aren't that good at conforming to user-specified constraints. They can generate "creative" texts but can't necessarily constrain and iterate on their output in a conversational setting effectively.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: