Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The merger is a good point. Assuming that the commissioners (not just Carr) were to participate in such a scheme. But this type of indirect regulatory pressure wouldn’t be new. Many tech companies implemented government directed online censorship (for example on COVID related topics) because they were worried about antitrust actions.


Yeah, and that was wrong too. Are you saying that because the government has overreached in the past makes this situation acceptable?


And Republicans protested loudly about this making freedom of speech a key reason to vote for them


> Many tech companies implemented government directed online censorship

Can you provide evidence for this? Right wing truisms are not sufficient.


It is very easy to find lots of evidence with a few searches if you’re curious. Here is one:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/zuckerberg-says-the-wh...

Edit: can’t reply to comment below me but that quote is referring to the instances where the company pushed back. It’s not saying they didn’t comply at all - they absolutely did on many instances, and Zuckerberg admitted guilt over it. See later quote:

> “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today,” he said, without elaborating. “We’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”


  The officials “expressed a lot of frustration” when the company didn’t agree, he said in the letter.
This contradicts the point you made. Did they or did they not implement them?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: