> can't just derive the pronunciation of a new word just from looking the components.
While true, I believe there’s also plenty of heuristics available to make a good guess at what the unknown word may relate semantically, and how it might sound like. Not reliable, of course, but still conveying some information for a better-than-random guess. Or am I wrong?
While true, I believe there’s also plenty of heuristics available to make a good guess at what the unknown word may relate semantically, and how it might sound like. Not reliable, of course, but still conveying some information for a better-than-random guess. Or am I wrong?