Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

the services that comply with speech suppression and privacy violation orders will be deemed acceptable, and those who don't won't.


With the caveat that by "speech suppression" you mean "spam suppression" and by "privacy violation orders" you mean "search warrants"


[flagged]


Pointing out your Russell conjugation does not make one a bootlicker.


insisting, against an overwhelming amount of irrefutable evidence to the contrary, that states like Australia and France are benevolent toward their citizens, does indeed make one a bootlicker.

was persecuting COVID dissidents "russian spam suppression"? are government-mandated backdoors "search warrants"?


Yeah pretty much. We know Russia was behind a whole lot of the pro-infection movement. Ostriching that fact doesn't make it stop being true. They've been doing stuff like this since the communist days, so they're very good at it now.


>We know Russia was behind a whole lot of the pro-infection movement.

yes, yes, there was no vaccine skepticism in the West before COVID.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: