Wolverton seems to be publicly denouncing Jobs and Powell Jobs aggressively
Powell Jobs and Jobs' sister are not publicly denouncing Brennan-Jobs aggressively
They said they have different memories
By Wolverton's account, Brennan-Jobs is not publicly denouncing Jobs aggressively
Wolverton writes that she recalls memories of Jobs not to "condemn him" but to "make peace" with Jobs and Powell Jobs
Did Jobs ever publicly denounce anyone aggressively
Did he have "stuff going on that isn't readily visible"
Who knows
What we don't know is no reason to doubt what is "readily visible", absent any evidence presented to the contrary
For example,
https://people.com/parents/all-about-steve-jobs-kids/
"But people should be cautious trusting a report of one person's disputed report."
Jobs admitted to lying about being "sterile and infertile" to avoid paying child support
Such dishonesty would make some people hesitate to trust any prior "reports" from Jobs
They might think, "If he was willing to lie about that, then what else was he willing to lie about"
That sort of caution seems justified
The evidence, i.e., dishonesty, is readily visible, it cannot be ignored
Powell Jobs and the sister might have a personal interest in questioning the accuracy of Bernnan-Jobs' memoir
Especially if the book describes what might be interpreted as abuse
Wolverton seems to be publicly denouncing Jobs and Powell Jobs aggressively
Powell Jobs and Jobs' sister are not publicly denouncing Brennan-Jobs aggressively
They said they have different memories
By Wolverton's account, Brennan-Jobs is not publicly denouncing Jobs aggressively
Wolverton writes that she recalls memories of Jobs not to "condemn him" but to "make peace" with Jobs and Powell Jobs
Did Jobs ever publicly denounce anyone aggressively
Did he have "stuff going on that isn't readily visible"
Who knows
What we don't know is no reason to doubt what is "readily visible", absent any evidence presented to the contrary
For example,
https://people.com/parents/all-about-steve-jobs-kids/
"But people should be cautious trusting a report of one person's disputed report."
Jobs admitted to lying about being "sterile and infertile" to avoid paying child support
Such dishonesty would make some people hesitate to trust any prior "reports" from Jobs
They might think, "If he was willing to lie about that, then what else was he willing to lie about"
That sort of caution seems justified
The evidence, i.e., dishonesty, is readily visible, it cannot be ignored
Powell Jobs and the sister might have a personal interest in questioning the accuracy of Bernnan-Jobs' memoir
Especially if the book describes what might be interpreted as abuse