Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm genuinely a bit confused — it seems like you're arguing that people should be able to have freedom to choose what to do, but not?


People can do whatever they think is right, of course (: so there is no "should". My point was that saying that a government should not impose communication restrictions is not necessary right. So, no, people should be happy: if they are happy without freedom, then let them be. If they are unhappy without freedom, let them make a revolution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: