> You won't convince them with practical examples, because this is a matter of principle. . . . Libertarians recognize only the particular and reject any notion of the universal, because it negates all particularities.
You describe people who advocate freedom as both mystics indifferent to reality and pragmatists without principle. Which is it?
Where do I claim that libertarians are pragmatists? They do have principles—just the wrong ones. Incidentally, I don’t think they’re really concerned with freedom, at least not in the Kantian sense.
I don’t think that either libertarians or Kant are genuinely concerned with freedom. My position is closest to classical liberalism, with different philosophical foundations.
You describe people who advocate freedom as both mystics indifferent to reality and pragmatists without principle. Which is it?